Opportunity for pen-urban Perth groundwater trade

Authored by Lei Gao, Jeff Connor, Rebecca Doble, Riasat Ali, Don McFarlane

Date Published: 2013

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.009

Sponsors: No sponsors listed

Platforms: No platforms listed

Model Documentation: Other Narrative Mathematical description

Model Code URLs: Model code not found

Abstract

Groundwater trade is widely advocated for reallocating scarce groundwater resources between competing users, and managing over-allocated and declining aquifers. However, groundwater markets are still in their infancy, and the potential benefits and opportunities need investigation, particularly where there is a need to reduce the extraction from declining aquifers. This article evaluates economic impacts of reducing groundwater extraction for irrigation use in peri-urban Perth, Australia, where irrigation, a lake-based ecosystem, and public water supply are highly dependent on a declining groundwater resource. We present an assessment of market-based water trading approaches to reduce groundwater extraction with an economic model representing diversity in returns to groundwater use across a population of irrigators. The results indicate that potential economic costs of a proportional reduction in available groundwater for irrigation are 18-21\% less if groundwater trade is possible. We also evaluate a water buyback from irrigation to provide public water supply as an alternative to new infrastructure. We find that buying back up to around 50\% of current irrigation allocations could create new public water supply only at the cost of \$0.32-0.39 million per GL, which is less than one fifth of the costs of new desalinisation or recycled water supply options (\$2-3 million per GL). We conclude that, with rapid development of computer and internet based trading platforms that allows fast, efficient and low cost multiple party trading, it is increasingly feasible to realise the economic potentials of market-based trade approaches for managing overexploited aquifers. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Tags

Agriculture Management systems Model Markets Us Water trade