Short-term cues used by foraging trout in a California stream

Authored by Charles Gowan

Date Published: 2007

DOI: 10.1007/s10641-006-9099-z

Sponsors: Chenery Endowment

Platforms: No platforms listed

Model Documentation: Other Narrative

Model Code URLs: Model code not found

Abstract

Stream salmonids choose foraging locations to maximize the energy benefit of foraging within the constraints of size-mediated dominance hierarchies and predation risk. But, because stream habitats are temporally variable, fish must use a search process to monitor changing habitat conditions as a means of locating potentially-better foraging locations. I explored the cues used by the cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarki clarki, when searching for food at the pool scale by artificially increasing prey availability at different locations by using special feeders and by manipulating pool velocities. Behavior of individually marked fish was monitored from stream bank platforms under unmanipulated control conditions and under seven experimental sets of conditions involving different combinations of feeder location and velocity manipulation. Under natural conditions fish elected to forage in the deepest (>50 cm), fastest (0.10-0.25 m s(-1)) locations and within 1 m of structure cover, but would readily move to shallower ( < 30 cm) water away from cover if velocities were manipulated to be highest there. Although fish did not locate feeders unless they were placed in high-velocity areas, when high velocity was provided fish would move into very shallow water ( < 20 cm) if prey were delivered there. Responses of individual trout to manipulations indicated that water velocity was the main physical cue used by fish to decide where to forage, and that fish could also learn about new food sources by observing conspecifics. Overall, results indicated fish were not ``perfect searchers{''} that could quickly locate news food resources over short time scales, even when the new resources were within a few meters of the fish's normal foraging location. When given the correct cues, however, fish could detect new food sources and defend them against subordinate fish. Movement of new fish into and out of the study pools during the ten-day observation period was common, consistent with the idea that trout used movement as a means of exploring and learning about habitat conditions at the reach scale.

Tags

Individual-based model habitat growth Brown trout Restricted movement Drift-feeding salmonids Juvenile coho salmon Rainbow-trout Position choice Brook trout