Trade-Offs and Coexistence: A Lottery Model Applied to Fig Wasp Communities
Authored by A Bradley Duthie, Karen C Abbott, John D Nason
Date Published: 2014
DOI: 10.1086/675897
Sponsors:
United States National Science Foundation (NSF)
Platforms:
No platforms listed
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Mathematical description
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
Ecological communities in which organisms complete their life cycles on
discrete ephemeral patches are common and often support an unusually
large number of species. Explaining this diversity is challenging for
communities of ecologically similar species undergoing preemptive
competition, where classic coexistence mechanisms may not readily apply.
We use nonpollinating fig wasps as a model community characterized by
high diversity and preemptive competition to show how subadditive
population growth and a trade-off between competitor fecundity and
dispersal ability can lead to coexistence. Because nonpollinator species
are often closely related, have similar life histories, and compete for
the same discrete resources, understanding their coexistence is
challenging given competitive exclusion is expected. Empirical
observations suggest that nonpollinating fig wasp species may face a
trade-off between egg loads and dispersal abilities. We model a lottery
in which a species' competitive ability is determined by a trade-off
between fecundity and dispersal ability. Variation in interpatch
distance between figs generates temporal variability in the relative
benefit of fecundity versus dispersal. We show that the temporal storage
effect leads to coexistence for a range of biologically realistic
parameter values. We further use individual-based modeling to show that
when species' traits evolve, coexistence is less likely but trait
divergence can result. We discuss the implications of this coexistence
mechanism for ephemeral patch systems wherein competition is strongly
preemptive.
Tags
Competition
Dynamics
Egg maturation strategy
Life-history evolution
Species richness
Phenological patterns
Flowering asynchrony
Patchy environments
Relative abundance
Ephemeral resource