Behavioral tradeoffs when dispersing across a patchy landscape
Authored by PA Zollner, SL Lima
Date Published: 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13711.x
Sponsors:
Theodore Roosevelt Fund
Platforms:
No platforms listed
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
A better understanding of the behavior of dispersing animals will assist
in determining the factors that limit their success and ultimately help
improve the way dispersal is incorporated into population models. To
that end, we used a simulation model to investigate three questions
about behavioral tradeoffs that dispersing animals might face: (i) speed
of movement against risk of predation, (ii) speed of movement against
foraging, and (iii) perceptual range against risk of predation. The
first investigation demonstrated that dispersing animals can generally
benefit by slowing from maximal speed to perform anti-predatory
behavior. The optimal speed was most strongly influenced by the
disperser's energetic reserves, the risk of predation it faced, the
interaction between these two parameters, and the effectiveness of its
anti-predatory behavior. Patch arrangement and the search strategy
employed by the dispersers had marginal effects on this tradeoff
relative to the above parameters. The second investigation demonstrated
that slowing movement to forage during dispersal may increase success
and that optimum speed of dispersal was primarily a function of the
dispersing animal's energetic reserves, predation risk, and their
interaction. The richness (density of food resources) of the interpatch
matrix and the patch arrangement had relatively minor impacts on how
much time a dispersing animal should spend foraging. The final
investigation demonstrated animals may face tradeoffs between dispersing
under conditions that involve a low risk of predation but limit their
ability to perceive distant habitat (necessitating more time spent
searching for habitat) and conditions that are inherently more risky but
allow animals to perceive distant habitat more readily. The precise
nature of this tradeoff was sensitive to the form of the relationship
between predation risk and perceptual range. Our overall results suggest
that simple depictions of these behavioral tradeoffs might suffice in
spatially explicit population models.
Tags
individual-based models
Heterogeneous landscapes
Spatially-explicit
Explicit population-models
White-footed mice
Ground-squirrels
Perceptual range
Mice peromyscus-maniculatus
Gap-crossing
decisions
Intermittent locomotion