Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting?
Authored by Atle Mysterud, Richard Bischof
Date Published: 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01621.x
Sponsors:
Norwegian Research Council (NRF)
Platforms:
No platforms listed
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Flow charts
Mathematical description
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
P> There is growing concern about the evolutionary consequences of human
harvesting on phenotypic trait quality in wild populations. Undesirable
consequences are especially likely with trophy hunting because of its
strong bias for specific phenotypic trait values, such as large antlers
in cervids and horns in bovids. Selective hunting can cause a decline in
a trophy trait over time if it is heritable, thereby reducing the
long-term sustainability of the activity itself.
How can we build a sustainable trophy hunting tradition without the
negative trait-altering effects? We used an individual-based model to
explore whether selective compensatory culling of `low quality'
individuals at an early life stage can facilitate sustainability, as
suggested by information from managed game populations in eastern and
central Europe. Our model was rooted in empirical data on red deer, where heritability of sexual ornaments has been confirmed and phenotypic
quality can be assessed by antler size in individuals as young as 1
year.
Simulations showed that targeted culling of low-quality yearlings could
counter the selective effects of trophy hunting on the distribution of
the affected trait (e.g. antler or horn size) in prime-aged individuals.
Assumptions of trait heritability and young-to-adult correlation were
essential for compensation, but the model proved robust to various other
assumptions and changes to input parameters. The simulation approach
allowed us to verify responses as evolutionary changes in trait values
rather than short-term consequences of altered age structure, density
and viability selection.
We conclude that evolutionarily enlightened management may accommodate
trophy hunting. This has far reaching implications as income from trophy
hunting is often channelled into local conservation efforts and rural
economies. As an essential follow-up, we recommend an analysis of the
effects of trophy hunting in conjunction with compensatory culling on
the phenotypic and underlying genetic variance of the trophy trait.
Tags
Population-dynamics
Body-weight
Life-history
White-tailed deer
Red deer
Quantitative genetics
Deer cervus-elaphus
Antler
characteristics
Wildlife
conservation
Bighorn sheep