Using mark-recapture data in an individual-based model to evaluate length-at-age differences between two Snake River white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus Richardson, 1836) populations in Idaho, USA

Authored by P Bates, J Chandler, K Lepla, K Steinhorst

Date Published: 2014

DOI: 10.1111/jai.12557

Sponsors: No sponsors listed

Platforms: No platforms listed

Model Documentation: Other Narrative

Model Code URLs: Model code not found

Abstract

Despite showing similar abundance estimates, population surveys of wild white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus Richardson, 1836) in the Bliss and Hells Canyon reaches of the Snake River display very different stock structures. To better understand these differences, an individual based model was developed using empirical mark-recapture metrics from 343 white sturgeon recaptured in the Bliss reach {[}at-large 1.0-19.9years], and 580 white sturgeon recaptured in the Hells Canyon reach {[}at-large 1.0-21.2years]. After calculating annual growth increments from these recaptures, individuals from each reach were assigned to size bins then randomly chosen from within each bin to grow' theoretical fish. This process was bootstrapped 1000 times, producing a mean length-at-age trajectory for each reach. From these data, mark-recapture samples were assigned estimated ages and fitted to a three-parameter logistic growth curve. Results indicate a wide disparity in length-at-age of white sturgeon between reaches, with the Bliss population displaying an intrinsic rate of increase {[}K=0.118] twice that of the Hells Canyon population {[}K=0.059]. This is due primarily to slow juvenile growth in the Hells Canyon population relative to juvenile growth in the Bliss population. The much slower growth rate of juveniles in the Hells Canyon reach has consequences to population demographics, such as age at first maturity. Although growth differences are large, both populations appear to be stable or increasing in abundance despite being regulated by very different mechanisms.

Tags

Validation habitat growth Accuracy California Canada Lower columbia-river Fin rays Precision