Increased water charges improve efficiency and equity in an irrigation system
Authored by Andrew Reid Bell, Patrick S Ward, M Azeem Ali Shah
Date Published: 2016
DOI: 10.5751/es-08642-210323
Sponsors:
USAID
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Platforms:
MATLAB
Model Documentation:
ODD
Pseudocode
Mathematical description
Model Code URLs:
https://www.comses.net/codebases/4727/releases/1.0.0/
Abstract
Conventional wisdom in many agricultural systems across the world is
that farmers cannot, will not, or should not pay the full costs
associated with surface water delivery. Across Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, only a handful can claim
complete recovery of operation, maintenance, and capital costs; across
Central and South Asia, fees are lower still, with farmers in Nepal, India, and Kazakhstan paying fractions of a U.S. penny for a cubic meter
of water. In Pakistan, fees amount to roughly USD 1-2 per acre per
season. However, farmers in Pakistan spend orders of magnitude more for
diesel fuel to pump groundwater each season, suggesting a latent
willingness to spend for water that, under the right conditions, could
potentially be directed toward water-use fees for surface water supply.
Although overall performance could be expected to improve with greater
cost recovery, asymmetric access to water in canal irrigation systems
leaves the question open as to whether those benefits would be equitably
shared among all farmers in the system. We develop an agent-based model
(ABM) of a small irrigation command to examine efficiency and equity
outcomes across a range of different cost structures for the maintenance
of the system, levels of market development, and assessed water charges.
We find that, robust to a range of different cost and structural
conditions, increased water charges lead to gains in both efficiency and
concomitant improvements in equity as investments in canal
infrastructure and system maintenance improve the conveyance of water
resources further down watercourses. This suggests that, under
conditions in which (1) farmers are currently spending money to pump
groundwater to compensate for a failing surface water system, and (2)
there is the possibility that through initial investment to provide
perceptibly better water supply, genuine win-win solutions can be
attained through higher water-use fees to beneficiary farmers.
Tags
models
Land-use
Mexico
Protocol
Forest
Southern yucatan
Pakistan