Interstitial flow differentially increases patient-derived glioblastoma stem cell invasion via CXCR4, CXCL12, and CD44-mediated mechanisms
Authored by Shayn M Peirce, Kathryn M Kingsmore, Daniel K Logsdon, Desiree H Floyd, Benjamin W Purow, Jennifer M Munson
Date Published: 2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ib00167j
Sponsors:
American Cancer Society
Platforms:
Repast
Java
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) prognosis remains dismal due in part to the
invasiveness of GBM cells. Interstitial fluid flow (IFF) has been shown
to increase invasion of glioma cells in vitro through the CXCR4 receptor
interacting with autologous, pericellular gradients of CXCL12
(autologous chemotaxis) or through the CD44 receptor interactions with
the extracellular matrix (hyaluronan-mediated mechanotransduction).
These mechanisms have not been examined together and thus we
hypothesized that both mechanisms contribute to invasion in populations
of cancer cells. Therefore, we examined IFF-stimulated CXCR4-, CXCL12-, and CD44-dependent invasion in patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells
(GSCs). Using our 3D in vitro assay and correlative in vivo studies we
demonstrated GSC lines show increased invasion with flow. This
flow-stimulated invasion was reduced by blockade of CXCR4, CXCL12, and/or CD44, revealing that GSC invasion may be mediated simultaneously
by both mechanisms. Characterization of CXCR4(+), CXCL12(+), and CD44(+)
populations in four GSC lines revealed different percentages of protein
positive subpopulations for each line. We developed an agent-based model
to identify the contributions of each subpopulation to flow-stimulated
invasion and validated the model through comparisons with experimental
blocking studies. Clinically relevant radiation therapy increased
flow-stimulated invasion in one GSC line. Our agent-based model
predicted that IFF-stimulated invasion is driven primarily by CXCR4(+)
CXCL12(+) populations, and, indeed our irradiated cells had an increase
in this subpopulation. Together, these data indicate that different
mechanisms govern the flow response across GSCs, but that within a
single patient, there are subpopulations of GSCs that respond to flow
via either CD44- or CXCR4-CXCL12 mechanisms.
Tags
Migration
Heterogeneity
Bacterial chemotaxis
Expression
Radiation-resistance
Extracellular-matrix
Glioma invasion
Computational-model
Tumor progression
Brain-tumors