Breaking Functional Connectivity into Components: A Novel Approach Using an Individual-Based Model, and First Outcomes
Authored by Guy Pe'er, Karin Frank, Klaus Henle, Claudia Dislich
Date Published: 2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022355
Sponsors:
No sponsors listed
Platforms:
MATLAB
Model Documentation:
ODD
Mathematical description
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
Landscape connectivity is a key factor determining the viability of
populations in fragmented landscapes. Predicting `functional
connectivity', namely whether a patch or a landscape functions as
connected from the perspective of a focal species, poses various
challenges. First, empirical data on the movement behaviour of species
is often scarce. Second, animal-landscape interactions are bound to
yield complex patterns. Lastly, functional connectivity involves various
components that are rarely assessed separately. We introduce the
spatially explicit, individual-based model FunCon as means to
distinguish between components of functional connectivity and to assess
how each of them affects the sensitivity of species and communities to
landscape structures. We then present the results of exploratory
simulations over six landscapes of different fragmentation levels and
across a range of hypothetical bird species that differ in their
response to habitat edges. i) Our results demonstrate that estimations
of functional connectivity depend not only on the response of species to
edges (avoidance versus penetration into the matrix), the movement mode
investigated (home range movements versus dispersal), and the way in
which the matrix is being crossed (random walk versus gap crossing), but
also on the choice of connectivity measure (in this case, the model
output examined). ii) We further show a strong effect of the mortality
scenario applied, indicating that movement decisions that do not fully
match the mortality risks are likely to reduce connectivity and enhance
sensitivity to fragmentation. iii) Despite these complexities, some
consistent patterns emerged. For instance, the ranking order of
landscapes in terms of functional connectivity was mostly consistent
across the entire range of hypothetical species, indicating that simple
landscape indices can potentially serve as valuable surrogates for
functional connectivity. Yet such simplifications must be carefully
evaluated in terms of the components of functional connectivity they
actually predict.
Tags
Landscape connectivity
Habitat connectivity
fragmented landscapes
Spatial structure
Matrix heterogeneity
Dynamic landscapes
Dispersal behavior
Atlantic-rain-forest
Patch
connectivity
Butterfly movement