Can longitudinal generalized estimating equation models distinguish network influence and homophily? An agent-based modeling approach to measurement characteristics
Authored by Meghan Hutchins, Kori Sauser Zachrison, Theodore J Iwashyna, Achamyeleh Gebremariam, Joyce M Lee
Date Published: 2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0274
Sponsors:
United States National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health
Platforms:
Java
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Model Code URLs:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.v3s0k
Abstract
Background: Connected individuals (or nodes) in a network are more
likely to be similar than two randomly selected nodes due to homophily
and/or network influence. Distinguishing between these two influences is
an important goal in network analysis, and generalized estimating
equation (GEE) analyses of longitudinal dyadic network data are an
attractive approach. It is not known to what extent such regressions can
accurately extract underlying data generating processes. Therefore our
primary objective is to determine to what extent, and under what
conditions, does the GEE-approach recreate the actual dynamics in an
agent-based model.
Methods: We generated simulated cohorts with pre-specified network
characteristics and attachments in both static and dynamic networks, and
we varied the presence of homophily and network influence. We then used
statistical regression and examined the GEE model performance in each
cohort to determine whether the model was able to detect the presence of
homophily and network influence.
Results: In cohorts with both static and dynamic networks, we find that
the GEE models have excellent sensitivity and reasonable specificity for
determining the presence or absence of network influence, but little
ability to distinguish whether or not homophily is present.
Conclusions: The GEE models are a valuable tool to examine for the
presence of network influence in longitudinal data, but are quite
limited with respect to homophily.
Tags
Obesity
Contagion
dynamic networks
Large social network
Instrumental variables