Using agent-based models to compare behavioral theories on experimental data: Application for irrigation games
Authored by Jacopo A Baggio, Marco A Janssen
Date Published: 2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.018
Sponsors:
United States National Science Foundation (NSF)
Platforms:
NetLogo
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Mathematical description
Model Code URLs:
https://www.comses.net/codebases/4488/releases/1.2.0/
Abstract
Behavioral experiments have demonstrated that people do cooperate in
commons dilemmas. There are alternative theories that are proposed to
explain the data. We will use agent-based models to compare alternative
behavioral theories on a series of experimental data of irrigation
games. The irrigation dilemma captures situations of asymmetric access
to common resources while contributions of all participants are needed
to maintain the physical infrastructure.
In our model analysis we compare various alternative theories, including
naive simple ones like selfish rational actors and altruistic actors. We
contrast these with various alternative behavioral models for collective
action as well as inclusion of other-regarding preferences. The
systematic comparison of alternative models on experimental data from 44
groups enables us to test which behavioral theories best explain the
observed effects of communication. We do not find that one theory
clearly outperform others in explaining the data. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
All rights reserved.
Tags
Agent-based models
Common pool resources
calibration
Collective Action
preferences
social dilemmas
Experimental data