The Social Benefits of Balancing Creativity and Imitation: Evidence From an Agent-Based Model
Authored by Liane Gabora, Simon Tseng
Date Published: 2017
DOI: 10.1037/aca0000132
Sponsors:
National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
Platforms:
No platforms listed
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Flow charts
Mathematical description
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
Although creativity is encouraged in the abstract it is often
discouraged in educational and workplace settings. Using an agent-based
model of cultural evolution, we investigated the idea that tempering the
novelty-generating effects of creativity with the novelty-preserving
effects of imitation is beneficial for society. In Experiment One we
systematically introduced individual differences in creativity, and
observed a trade-off between the ratio of creators to imitators and how
creative the creators were. Excess creativity was detrimental because
creators invested in unproven ideas at the expense of propagating proven
ones. Experiment Two tested the hypothesis that society as a whole
benefits if individuals adjust how creative they are in accordance with
their creative success. When effective creators created more, and
ineffective creators created less (social regulation), the agents
segregated into creators and imitators, and the mean fitness of outputs
was temporarily higher. We hypothesized that the temporary nature of the
effect was attributable to a ceiling on output fitness. In Experiment
Three we made the space of possible outputs open-ended by giving agents
the capacity to chain simple outputs into arbitrarily complex ones such
that fitter outputs were always possible. With the capacity for chained
outputs, the effect of social regulation could indeed be maintained
indefinitely. The results are discussed in light of empirical data.
Tags
Agent-based model
Performance
creativity
systems
Personality
imitation
cognition
Generality
Framework
Cultural-evolution
Learning strategies
Future-directions
Classroom
Individual differences
Social
regulation