Consequences of morphological plasticity and fragmentation on space occupation of coral reef macroalgae
Authored by Ligia Collado-Vides, John W McManus, Aletta T Yniguez
Date Published: 2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.04.024
Sponsors:
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
International Society for Reef Studies/Ocean Conservancy Fellowship
Khalid bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation
Project Aware
Platforms:
Java
MASON
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Flow charts
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
The macroalgal species, Halimeda tuna, Halimeda opuntia, and Dictyota
sp., are modular and clonal organisms that have the capability for
morphological plasticity and asexual reproduction through fragmentation.
Growth and disturbance factors affect these characteristics and
consequently their rate and amount of space capture. A three-dimensional
agent-based model SPREAD (Spatially-explicit Reef Algae Dynamics) was
used to explore these potential consequences under a range of growth and
disturbance conditions, and to investigate the particular conditions
leading to variations of these macroalgae in the inshore patch and
offshore reefs in the Florida Reef Tract. The morphology of macroalgae, particularly for H. tuna, had an effect on the rate and amount of space
occupation, where larger and more upright forms were able to attain
greater cover. Even with the more prolific growth forms, space
occupation was still limited. Inclusion of fragmentation was needed for
greater expansion and to obtain abundances comparable to field
observations. Disturbance, whether through herbivory or stronger forces
like storms, interacts with fragmentation in determining space
occupation patterns of the macroalgae species. High disturbance levels
can promote increased fragmentation and spatial cover. However, this
appears to be only true for H. opuntia and Dictyota sp., species with
relatively high fragment survival capacity. H. tuna achieved higher
cover at low disturbances. Strong disturbances leading to larger
fragment sizes were detrimental to the spatial spread for all species.
Temporally, these macroalgal populations in the studied reefs appeared
to be stable overall with seasonal increases and decreases, as was shown
possible in the model, observed in the field, and supported in the
literature. Based on SPREAD and corroborated with field observations, the combined inherent growth requirements, capability for fragment
success, and disturbance through fragment generation influenced the
abundance of these macroalgae in inshore patch and offshore reefs which
experienced different growth and disturbance conditions. The overall
stable macroalgal cover in the observed and simulated Florida Keys reefs
permits other organisms, particularly hard corals, to capture space on
the reef. Nonetheless, specific local conditions and the timing of
macroalgae seasonal increases can impact the spatial spread of other
benthic organisms. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Tags
Great-barrier-reef
Florida-keys
Phase-shifts
Brown alga
Madracis-mirabilis
Caulerpa-taxifolia
Southeast florida
Halimeda-opuntia
Gorgonian coral
Dictyota spp.