Interpreting malaria age-prevalence and incidence curves: a simulation study of the effects of different types of heterogeneity
Authored by Amanda Ross, Thomas Smith
Date Published: 2010
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-132
Sponsors:
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Platforms:
No platforms listed
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
Background: Individuals in a malaria endemic community differ from one
another. Many of these differences, such as heterogeneities in
transmission or treatment-seeking behaviour, affect malaria
epidemiology. The different kinds of heterogeneity are likely to be
correlated. Little is known about their impact on the shape of
age-prevalence and incidence curves. In this study, the effects of
heterogeneity in transmission, treatment-seeking and risk of
co-morbidity were simulated.
Methods: Simple patterns of heterogeneity were incorporated into a
comprehensive individual-based model of Plasmodium falciparum malaria
epidemiology. The different types of heterogeneity were systematically
simulated individually, and in independent and co-varying pairs. The
effects on age-curves for parasite prevalence, uncomplicated and severe
episodes, direct and indirect mortality and first-line treatments and
hospital admissions were examined.
Results: Different heterogeneities affected different outcomes with
large effects reserved for outcomes which are directly affected by the
action of the heterogeneity rather than via feedback on acquired
immunity or fever thresholds. Transmission heterogeneity affected the
age-curves for all outcomes. The peak parasite prevalence was reduced
and all age-incidence curves crossed those of the reference scenario
with a lower incidence in younger children and higher in older
age-groups. Heterogeneity in the probability of seeking treatment
reduced the peak incidence of first-line treatment and hospital
admissions. Heterogeneity in co-morbidity risk showed little overall
effect, but high and low values cancelled out for outcomes directly
affected by its action. Independently varying pairs of heterogeneities
produced additive effects. More variable results were produced for
co-varying heterogeneities, with striking differences compared to
independent pairs for some outcomes which were affected by both
heterogeneities individually.
Conclusions: Different kinds of heterogeneity both have different
effects and affect different outcomes. Patterns of co-variation are also
important. Alongside the absolute levels of different factors affecting
age-curves, patterns of heterogeneity should be considered when
parameterizing or validating models, interpreting data and inferring
from one outcome to another.
Tags
Infection
Model
Sub-saharan africa
Plasmodium-falciparum malaria
Transmission intensity
Endemic areas
Intermittent
preventive treatment
Epidemiologic impact
Interventions reach
Inoculation rate