Using an agent-based model to examine forest management outcomes in a fire-prone landscape in Oregon, USA
Authored by John P Bolte, Alan Ager, Jennifer Koch, Peter H Singleton, Thomas A Spies, Robert J Pabst, Jeffrey D Kline, Michelle M Steen-Adams, Susan Charnley, John D Bailey, Ana M G Barros, Eric White, Keith A Olsen, Emily K Platt, James Sulzman, Cynthia Schwartz, Blair Csuti
Date Published: 2017
DOI: 10.5751/es-08841-220125
Sponsors:
No sponsors listed
Platforms:
No platforms listed
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
Fire-prone landscapes present many challenges for both managers and
policy makers in developing adaptive behaviors and institutions. We used
a coupled human and natural systems framework and an agent-based
landscape model to examine how alternative management scenarios affect
fire and ecosystem services metrics in a fire-prone multiownership
landscape in the eastern Cascades of Oregon. Our model incorporated
existing models of vegetation succession and fire spread and information
from original empirical studies of landowner decision making. Our
findings indicate that alternative management strategies can have
variable effects on landscape outcomes over 50 years for fire,
socioeconomic, and ecosystem services metrics. For example, scenarios
with federal restoration treatments had slightly less high-severity fire
than a scenario without treatment; exposure of homes in the
wildland-urban interface to fire was also slightly less with restoration
treatments compared to no management. Treatments appeared to be more
effective at reducing high-severity fire in years with more fire than in
years with less fire. Under the current management scenario, timber
production could be maintained for at least 50 years on federal lands.
Under an accelerated restoration scenario, timber production fell
because of a shortage of areas meeting current stand structure treatment
targets. Trade-offs between restoration outcomes (e.g., open forests
with large fire-resistant trees) and habitat for species that require
dense older forests were evident. For example, the proportional area of
nesting habitat for northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis) was
somewhat less after 50 years under the restoration scenarios than under
no management. However, the amount of resilient older forest structure
and habitat for white-headed woodpecker (Leuconotopicus albolarvatus)
was higher after 50 years under active management. More carbon was
stored on this landscape without management than with management,
despite the occurrence of high-severity wildfire. Our results and
further applications of the model could be used in collaborative
settings to facilitate discussion and development of policies and
practices for fire-prone landscapes.
Tags
Adaptation
Simulation
Management
Landscape
Land-use
Ecosystem services
Wildfire
Vegetation dynamics
Northern spotted owl
Wildfire risk
Western united-states
Mixed-conifer forests
Occidentalis caurina habitat
Wildland-urban
interface
Fuels treatments