Examining the influence of biophysical conditions on wildland-urban interface homeowners' wildfire risk mitigation activities in fire-prone landscapes
Authored by Jeffrey D Kline, Christine S Olsen, Alan A Ager, Keith A Olsen, Karen C Short
Date Published: 2017
DOI: 10.5751/es-09054-220121
Sponsors:
No sponsors listed
Platforms:
No platforms listed
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
Expansion of the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and the increasing size
and number of wildfires has policy-makers and wildfire managers seeking
ways to reduce wildfire risk in communities located near fire-prone
forests. It is widely acknowledged that homeowners can reduce their
exposure to wildfire risk by using nonflammable building materials and
reducing tree density near the home, among other actions. Although these
actions can reduce the vulnerability of homes to wildfire, many
homeowners do not take them. We examined the influence of risk factors
on homeowners' perceived wildfire risk components using a survey of WUI
homeowners in central Oregon (USA) and biophysical data that described
wildfire risk as predicted by wildfire simulation models, past wildfire,
and vegetation characteristics. Our analysis included homeowners'
perceptions of the likelihood of wildfire and resulting damage, and
examined how these factors contribute to homeowners' likelihood to
conduct mitigation actions. We developed an empirical model of
homeowners' risk perceptions and mitigation behavior, which served as
input into an agent-based model to examine potential landscape and
behavior changes over 50 years. We found homeowners' wildfire risk
perceptions to be positively correlated with hazardous conditions
predicted by fuel models and weakly predictive of mitigation behavior.
Homeowners' perceived chance of wildfire was positively correlated with
actual probability of wildfire, while their perceived chance of damage
to the home was positively correlated with potential wildfire intensity.
Wildfire risk perceptions also were found to be correlated with past
wildfire experience. Our results suggest that homeowners may be savvy
observers of landscape conditions, which act as ``feedbacks{''} that
enhance homeowners' concerns about wildfire hazard and motivate them to
take mitigation action. Alternatively, homeowners living in hazardous
locations are somehow receiving the message that they need to take
protective measures. Mitigation compliance output from the agent-based
model suggests that completion of mitigation actions is likely to
increase over 50 years under various scenarios.
Tags
Risk
Decisions
United-states
Oregon
Perceptions
Preparedness
Behaviors
Defensible space
Firewise
Hazard
Wildfire exposure
Wildland-urban interface
Suppression expenditures
Social amplification
Residents