Modeling grizzly bear habitats in the Yellowhead Ecosystem of Alberta: Taking autocorrelation seriously
Authored by SE Nielson, MS Boyce, GB Stenhouse, RHM Munro
Date Published: 2002
Sponsors:
National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
Alberta Conservation Association (ACA)
Ainsworth Lumber
Alberta Energy Company
Alberta Sustainable Resource Development
Alberta Newsprint
Anderson Resources Ltd.
AVID Canada
BC Oil and Gas Commission Environmental Fund
Blue Ridge Lumber
Mountain Equipment Coop
Petroleum Technology Alliance of Canada (PTAC)
The Centre for Wildlife Conservation (USA)
World Wildlife Fund
Platforms:
No platforms listed
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Mathematical description
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
We used resource selection functions (RSF) to estimate relative
probability ofgrizzly bear (Ursus arctos) use for habitats, landscape
features, and areas of varying human access density across a 5,342-km(2)
study area in west-central Alberta, Canada. Models were developed based
on 1999 data at both the population and individual levels for the spring
and summer-autumn seasons. Individual-based RSF models revealed strong
differences in selection among animals. Models developed for the
summer-autumn season fit better than models of the spring season. High
greenness values, derived from Landsat imagery, corresponded well with
grizzly bear habitat use. Significance of parameters was frequently
overestimated when using logistic regression models that were
unadjustedfor autocorrelation or pseudoreplication, both in
individual-based models andin population-based models. Although not
affecting predictability of bears atthe individual-level, such biases
may lead to inappropriate conclusions without adjustment.
Population-based models further showed bias without correction for
pseudo-replication within individuals (unit of replication).
Considerationof variance inflation factors and nesting of telemetry
points on the individual enhances the reliability of habitat modeling.
We found problems predicting grizzly bear habitat use when local habitat
index models were used. The RSF models presented here improve such
models while also generating information on the contribution of
particular environmental variables.
Tags