FORAGING THEORY AND PISCIVOROUS FISH - ARE FORAGE FISH JUST BIG ZOOPLANKTON
Authored by JE BRECK
Date Published: 1993
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1993)122<0902:ftapfa>2.3.co;2
Sponsors:
Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Program
Platforms:
No platforms listed
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Mathematical description
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
Insights into the dynamics of fish growth can be gained by using
foraging theory to link bioenergetics models of fish and their prey.
These links are critical for modeling fish daily ration and growth, prey
mortality, selection among prey, and competition among predators.
However, the foraging theory that is relatively well developed for
planktivores does not always apply to piscivores without important
modifications. Visual encounter is often limited by visual acuity for
most planktivores, but probably limited by prey contrast for piscivores, so that piscivore reactive distance is much less dependent on prey size.
Whereas handling time per prey may limit the capture rate for some
planktivores, it is irrelevant for most piscivores, which eat relatively
small numbers of large prey and are more likely to have daily ration
limited by rates of digestion or prey encounter. Time for gastric
evacuation or digestion should not be a part of handling time, because
search can occur simultaneously with digestion. If handling time is not
important for piscivores, then Holling's type 1 functional response may
be more appropriate than his type 2 response. An alternative form of the
functional response is presented for predators that feed on prey of
uniform size and stop foraging each day when some maximum number of prey
are ingested. This functional response rises to an asymptote like a type
2 response, but it is based on a very different mechanism. Simulations
with a bioenergetics model show that the variance in daily growth among
individuals is likely to be greater for piscivores, which feed on a
small number of large prey, than for planktivores, which feed on a large
number of small prey.
Tags
Habitat use
Functional-response
Individual-based
model
Prey selection
Planktivorous fish
Largemouth bass
Perch perca-flavescens
Reactive distance
Body size
Bluegill lepomis-macrochirus