Low-dimensional trade-offs fail to explain richness and structure in species-rich plant communities
Authored by Juergen Groeneveld, Florian Jeltsch, George L W Perry, Alexandra Esther, Neal J Enright, Ben P Miller, Byron B Lamont, Britta Tietjen
Date Published: 2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12080-010-0092-y
Sponsors:
European Union
German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG)
Australian Research Council (ARC)
Platforms:
R
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Flow charts
Mathematical description
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
Mathematical models and ecological theory suggest that low-dimensional
life history trade-offs (i.e. negative correlation between two life
history traits such as competition vs. colonisation) may potentially
explain the maintenance of species diversity and community structure. In
the absence of trade-offs, we would expect communities to be dominated
by `super-types' characterised by mainly positive trait expressions.
However, it has proven difficult to find strong empirical evidence for
such trade-offs in species-rich communities. We developed a spatially
explicit, rule-based and individual-based stochastic model to explore
the importance of low-dimensional trade-offs. This model simulates the
community dynamics of 288 virtual plant functional types (PFTs), each of
which is described by seven life history traits. We consider trait
combinations that fit into the trade-off concept, as well as super-types
with little or no energy constraints or resource limitations, and weak
PFTs, which do not exploit resources efficiently. The model is
parameterised using data from a fire-prone, species-rich
Mediterranean-type shrubland in southwestern Australia. We performed an
exclusion experiment, where we sequentially removed the strongest PFT in
the simulation and studied the remaining communities. We analysed the
impact of traits on performance of PFTs in the exclusion experiment with
standard and boosted regression trees. Regression tree analysis of the
simulation results showed that the trade-off concept is necessary for
PFT viability in the case of weak trait expression combinations such as
low seed production or small seeds. However, species richness and
diversity can be high despite the presence of super-types. Furthermore, the exclusion of super-types does not necessarily lead to a large
increase in PFT richness and diversity. We conclude that low-dimensional
trade-offs do not provide explanations for multi-species co-existence
contrary to the prediction of many conceptual models.
Tags
Competition
Dynamics
Coexistence
Model
Semiarid savannas
Canopy seed storage
Fire-prone environments
Ecological significance
Regression trees
Functional types