Modelling density-dependent fish shoal distributions in the laboratory and field
                Authored by Iain D Couzin, E Hensor, R James, J Krause
                
                    Date Published: 2005
                
                
                    DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13513.x
                
                
                    Sponsors:
                    
                        Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
                        
                        United States National Science Foundation (NSF)
                        
                        Pew  Program  in Biocomplexity
                        
                
                
                    Platforms:
                    
                        No platforms listed
                    
                
                
                    Model Documentation:
                    
                        Other Narrative
                        
                        Mathematical description
                        
                
                
                    Model Code URLs:
                    
                        Model code not found
                    
                
                Abstract
                Density-dependent variables have long been established as an important
area of ecological research, but the effects of the local density of
conspecifics on grouping behaviour are less well-studied. We compared
the influence of the density of conspecifics on the shoal size
distribution of killifish, Fundulus diaphanus, in the laboratory and the
field. In both environments we observed an increase in shoal size and
shoal number with the density of individuals present. The increase in
shoal size was markedly steeper in the field than in the laboratory, but
direct comparison of the two was complicated by the fact that the
absolute numbers of fish present at the field site were considerably
higher than those used in the laboratory trials. We developed an
individual-based model that was first used as a null model of shoal
formation (defined by proximity to others) in fish with no shoaling
tendency over the same range of densities used in the laboratory. Group
size increased much more rapidly with increasing density in the
laboratory than predicted by the null model. When we incorporated
shoaling behaviour into our model, the laboratory results could be
reproduced with high accuracy. However, when extrapolated to match
conditions in the field, the model predicted smaller, more numerous
shoals than were actually observed. We suggest this is due to
heterogeneity of the field environment because fish were found to be
highly aggregated in certain areas of our field site. The predictive
power of laboratory studies for the field is discussed with regards to
using individual-based modelling as a tool for deriving such
predictions.
                
Tags
                
                    Simulation
                
                    behavior
                
                    Schools
                
                    Mechanism
                
                    patterns
                
                    scale
                
                    Organization
                
                    Individuals
                
                    Aggregations