Evolution of fairness in the dictator game by multilevel selection
Authored by Paul E Smaldino, Jeffrey C Schank, Matt L Miller
Date Published: 2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.06.031
Sponsors:
United States National Science Foundation (NSF)
Platforms:
No platforms listed
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Flow charts
Mathematical description
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
The most perplexing experimental results on fairness come from the
dictator game where one of two players, the dictator, decides how to
divide a resource with an anonymous player. The dictator, acting
self-interestedly, should offer nothing to the anonymous second player, but in experimental studies, dictators offer much more than nothing. We
developed a multilevel selection model to explain why people offer more
than nothing in the dictator game. We show that fairness can evolve when
population structure emerges from the aggregation and limited dispersal
of offspring. We begin with an analytical model that shows how fair
behavior can benefit groups by minimizing within-group variance in
resources and thereby increasing group fitness. To investigate the
generality of this result, we developed an agent-based model with agents
that have no information about other agents. We allowed agents to
aggregate into groups and evolve different levels of fairness by playing
the dictator game for resources to reproduce. This allowed multilevel
selection to emerge from the spatiotemporal properties of individual
agents. We found that the population structure that emerged under low
population densities was most conducive to the evolution of fairness, which is consistent with group selection as a major evolutionary force.
We also found that fairness only evolves if resources are not too scarce
relative to the lifespan of agents. We conclude that the evolution of
fairness could evolve under multilevel selection. Thus, our model
provides a novel explanation for the results of dictator game
experiments, in which participants often fairly split a resource rather
than keeping it all for themselves. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights
reserved.
Tags