Modelling the influence of copepod behaviour on faecal pellet export at high latitudes
Authored by M I Wallace, F R Cottier, A S Brierley, G A Tarling
Date Published: 2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-013-1287-7
Sponsors:
United Kingdom Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
British Antarctic Survey
Platforms:
No platforms listed
Model Documentation:
Other Narrative
Flow charts
Mathematical description
Model Code URLs:
Model code not found
Abstract
The contribution of faecal pellet (FP) production by zooplankton to the
downward flux of particulate organic carbon (POC) can vary from < 1 \%
to more than 90 \% of total POC. This results from varying degrees of
interception and consumption, and hence recycling, of FPs by zooplankton
in the upper mixed layers, and the active transport of FP to depth via
diel vertical migration (VM) of zooplankton. During mid-summer at high
latitudes, synchronised diel VM ceases, but individual zooplankton may
continue to make forays into and out of the surface layers. This study
considers the relative importance of different VM behaviours on FP
export at high latitudes. We focussed on copepods and parameterised an
individual-based model using empirical measures of phytoplankton
vertical distribution and the rate of FP production, as a function of
food availability. FP production was estimated under three different
behaviours common to high-latitude environments (1) no VM, (2)
foray-type behaviour and (3) synchronised diel VM. Simulations were also
made of how each of these behaviours would be observed by an acoustic
Doppler current profiler (ADCP). The model found that the type of
copepod behaviour made a substantial difference to the level of FP
export to depth. In the absence of VM, all FPs were produced above 50 m, where the probability of eventual export to depth was low. In foray-type
scenarios, FP production occurred between 0 and 80 m, although the
majority occurred between 30 and 70 m depth. Greatest FP production in
the deeper layers (> 70 m) occurred when diel VM took place. Simulated
ADCP vertical velocity fields from the foray-type scenario resembled
field observations, particularly with regard to the occurrence of
positive anomalies in deeper waters and negative anomalies in shallower
waters. The model illustrates that active vertical flux of zooplankton
FP can occur at high latitudes even when no synchronised VM is taking
place.
Tags
Diel vertical migration
Temora-longicornis
Particulate organic-carbon
Sea-ice cover
Calanus-pacificus
Planktonic copepods
Phytoplankton bloom
Arctic zooplankton
Swimming activity
Active-transport